As you drive over to the client site your mind begins to consider Empires again. My company is an empire, or they are striving to be. I have always considered my boss to be a little Napoleon, but he has always been straight with me. He has never asked me to do anything, “unethical” but yet I know he has been consumed lately with the organization chart and our spot in the bigger “business unit”. Whatever that means. His annual bonus is tied directly to his position in the “business unit” and how we finish the year in revenue compared to the rest of the business units. Fortunately for me I am on a fixed salary. I can be free to say the things that need to be said. If I can’t help this client, there will be another one, and although we didn’t land this contract, I’ll still get paid. My boss will just have to wait until next year to take his wife to the Bahamas.
At this point I should clarify that in any empire, ah hum, organization there are two classes of clients. Those who wish to profit whom I will refer to as the commercial sector client or CSC, and those who do not wish to profit or that unfortunate class of entities that I will refer to as the not-for-profit client, the NFP for short. The NFP’s can include non-profit organizations but I am primarily referring to the ubiquitous and all powerful government entities that dot our landscape and blot out the sun, particularly if you live in your nations capital.
If you happen to be a CSC the truth is as follows – there are many of you competing for a share of the marketplace. In any particular market sector, unless you are a monopoly (but keep that dirty little secret to yourself), there are many of you who can fulfill the same need in your sector. What distinguishes you? Is it fresher ingredients? Is it an altruistic need to donate 5 cents of the purchase price of your product to a favorite charity? Is it better marketing and packaging? Or is it, hopefully, an actual product that is superior perhaps in both quality and service? These would be rare, but if they could be found wouldn’t they dominate the marketplace? Yes, in fact they would, or should, if it wasn’t for all the other charlatans running around claiming the same superior quality and service. How can they do that? Clearly someone has to be better. Maybe we should hire a professional analyst to make that determination – or maybe we should just leave well enough alone. To the CSC the truth might seem like the right and reasonable thing to discover – but it could also be very dangerous. So for the analyst, employment to seek the truth with the CSC will have to be reserved for perhaps improving the efficiency of internal methods and procedures not so much in marketing a product – that’s where the real money is – but unfortunately, that money goes to the analysts that can help them sell a product. And those analysts work on Madison Avenue. We refer to them as marketing and advertising firms or MAFs. And we all know they always tell the truth.
Don’t worry we still have the NFP client so you are not out of a job yet – at least one in which you can tell the truth. Since the NFPs are not for profit they must have room for the truth. Not so fast. Profit might be a measure of success for the CSC but it can also be a motivating force in the running of a NFP, maybe not so much in the way of monetary gain, but typically in the form of prestige and power. NFPs and those who run them, love to make the right decisions. Right decisions are good and make you look good and feel good. Wrong decisions are bad and help you loose your job or get voted out of office. The problem with NFP is that they typically are heavily bureaucratic organizations that have been built up over many years on a combination of perhaps good decisions but also many bad decisions. When bad decisions have been made they tend to hang around for a while. Dirty laundry is everywhere and hey it smells like a locker room in here. But I digress. The trouble is, no matter how many good decisions are currently being made, if an analyst comes in and starts asking questions, sooner or later the bad decisions will surface. Maybe something can be done, maybe something can’t be done, but the dirty secrets make everyone feel uncomfortable.
So even if there is a clear problem with several courses of action, the best course of action – or the course of action determined to be the best – might require airing out the decision that is causing the smell. A recommendation of this nature, while satisfying to the analyst as the truth, might not be the path the NFP client wants to take. Sometimes it’s simple if the particular client was not the client when the bad decision was made. But many times, it was the client themselves who made the bad decision in the first place. At these moments for the analyst, thinking about opening up that bar down in the Bahama’s doesn’t seem like such a wild idea after all. Yes, organizations can profit from the truth, and they should. However, the third principle for seeking the truth is being aware that the truth might not be sought.
Hey Mooch-- You've listed some good principles along the way in your ten posts. Are you going to post them together anywhere? Maybe a link to a list of good aphorisms or "sticky" thoughts? Something I can put in my cube.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post and I get it 100%. There's a leap of faith involved for both the analyst and the management at the NFP, because only through an honest assessment of things can a NFP hope to improve - there is no other way. My experience in NFPs reveals organizations that regularly and willfully deceive themselves about where they are. This makes it terribly difficult (or amusing) to come up with a route for where they're trying to go.
ReplyDelete@Tasha -- Thanks. Let's not move too quickly. Let's first see if my streak of "sticky" thoughts can hold up. You never know I might start drooling on myself and pontificating about the virtues of collaboration and the effectiveness of AFSO-21.
ReplyDelete@Merf -- even NFP must grow to survive and that growth is profit. Profit for the members in terms of credibility and stability etc. Our most honored institutions are profit and growth motivated and highly competitive when faced with threating knowledge that may contain truth. I think Geoffrey Miller's book "Spent" hits the ball out of the park when he talks about Universities (Harvard) being the biggest critic of the use of IQ tests because if we all knew our IQ, and it was tattooed onto our head, we wouldn't need a degree from Harvard to give us the same credibility. If word got out, "Markets will crash crash, Financial Empires will Crumble Crumble". A Harvard degree would not be made of Gold.
Extra points for the source of the quote!
Sorry to diappoint you, Mooch, but Eric is another fellow altogether.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I caan quote that film in 1 note: "Hudson Hawk." One of my absolute favorite films.
Eric E of course. My bad Merf...Eric E is a big contributor to the blogosphere at work I am always referencing...and if fact just referenced in my latest blog yesterday. Hopefully Eric will weigh in on my side of that debate soon.
ReplyDelete